Sir, I personally feel very let down after reading Clr. Davies’s article on Brynhir Fields!

Firstly, ‘dog walking’ is the least of our concerns, and getting local schools to name estate roads adds insult to injury, considering she is purposing to take away their green space, wildlife environment, and aiding global warming!

But what really jumped out at me was... ‘subject to the local connection policy on first let’! So there is no guarantee that these houses will stay local. I know already that the ‘local connection policy’ is easily removed from properties - either rented or sold. These houses will not remain for any length of time available to local people,

Surely Tenby’s future lies in its town, and PCC, having £4 million to spend, would be better buying houses and flats that come on the market in the town itself. Why should local people have to drive/bus into Tenby. Buying houses in the town puts the heart back into Tenby, summer and winter, driving house prices back to what they should be, as long as PCC safeguard their housing policy.

As for Clr. Blackhall feeling ‘offended’ over a comment in a recent letter to the paper, I feel he should be ‘worried’, as our cemetery has no room to enlarge and at the moment is half full! As this scheme puts 14 houses in what I was once told was the ‘overflow’ cemetery, where are we all eventually going to end up?

I found the comments made by the Civic Society rather confusing, are they for or against? As to what ‘the lack of road connections to Upper Hill Park and Seascape is welcome’ meant, I’m not really sure!

If our councillors are listening... leave Brynhir Fields alone, it is a beautiful, wild green space; something to be proud of.

Sandra Williams,

Tenby.