Sir,

I am convinced that I am not the only one who is deeply concerned by the whole concept and implementation of the legislation to introduce the controversial post of Police and Crime Commissioner.

The level of information regarding the accurate job specification, the qualifications required, the nomination procedure and the post-holder's position in the hierarchy of law enforcement is incredibly low - and somewhat ambiguous. For example, the Poll Card issued to the electorate advises that information about candidates standing in this area can be found at http://www.choosemypcc.org.uk">www.choosemypcc.org.uk -not true - this site informs me that NO information will be forthcoming until October 26! - What possible reason can there be for this?

My concern is exacerbated by the fact that a 'One Team Policing' website openly lists the Dyfed Powys Police Area candidates as Christine Gwyther (Labour), Christopher Salmon (Conservative) and Rod Richard (Independent). It is fascinating to note that the issue is already a political one; doubtless the Labour and Conservative parties will add their weight and wealth to their candidate's campaign, instantly disadvantaging the independent candidate, regardless of the suitability of each person for the post. I had always believed that the Police Force, like the Armed Forces, was a non-political organisation which served the administration elected by the nation impartially.

I read in a national broadsheet today that 'this is your chance to have your say in how the police operate in your area' - actually I suspect that nothing could be further from the truth. What is on offer is just one chance to randomly select the name of someone you have probably never heard of and almost certainly know nothing about, and if you give them your vote, propel them into an extremely well paid job. They will wield a great deal of power - hopefully in a professional and efficient manner - but even if they are totally useless they can still use the hackneyed cry "I was elected to this post by my peers."

I firmly believe that this is a seriously flawed process. Sadly, I can see no solution other than to show one's lack of support by abstaining from the vote and thus expressing disapproval. This is, of course, a weak and risky course of action since politically motivated voters will probably follow the party line and seek election for the party's candidate as opposed to the best person for the job - whoever that may be!

Whatever the outcome, two things are quite certain; there will be a low turnout and whatever the result, a further layer of plutocracy will be added to our government.

Lt. Col. (Ret.) M. F. Fox,

Tenby.